How does my area compare?
Edmonton and Winchmore Hill has the highest spending on Universal Credit per person aged 16 to 64 in 2024-25.
Help with living costs for working-age people on a low income, in or out of work. Shown in 2026-27 prices, adjusted for inflation so that years can be compared.
Selected Angus and Perthshire Glens: £1,407 per person aged 16 to 64, 2024-25, 378th of 632 constituencies.
Per person aged 16 to 64, low to high
- Under £1,135
- £1,135 to £1,480
- £1,480 to £1,825
- £1,825 to £2,169
- £2,169 to £2,514
- £2,514 and over
More ways to look at itHow ranks change, why spending changed, and spending compared with the expected level
Total or per person
Does the order change when you count per person?
Each line is one of the 632 ranked constituencies. It joins the area's rank for each way of counting. The 10 highest per person aged 16 to 64 are drawn in dark lines, and the selected area in gold.
What changed
More people, more claims or bigger payments?
Angus and Perthshire Glens, Universal Credit: yearly spending at the rate in May 2023 and in May 2026. The chart splits the change into three parts: the number of people in the age group, the share of them claiming, and the average payment. 2026-27 prices.
| May 2023 | £64.4m |
|---|---|
| Population | −£0.24m |
| Share claiming | +£27.4m |
| Payment size | +£12.0m |
| May 2026 | £103.6m |
Compared with similar areas
Is spending higher or lower than expected?
Spending on working-age benefits per person aged 16 to 64, 2024-25. We compare it with the level we would expect from each area's share of children and of people aged 66 and over, how deprived it is compared with the rest of its nation, and the typical pay of people who live there. 2026-27 prices.
Every constituency
Spending on Universal Credit, 2024-25. Rank is for per person aged 16 to 64, and 1 is the highest. Areas with fewer than 1,000 people in the age group have no rank. The first 50 of 632 rows are shown.
| Rank | Notes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edmonton and Winchmore Hill | £318.3m | £2,544 | £3,991 | |
| 2 | Enfield North | £325.0m | £2,549 | £3,978 | |
| 3 | Brent East | £355.5m | £2,592 | £3,812 | |
| 4 | Hackney North and Stoke Newington | £305.1m | £2,599 | £3,775 | |
| 5 | Tottenham | £363.2m | £2,624 | £3,676 | |
| 6 | Birmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North | £245.6m | £1,958 | £3,140 | |
| 7 | Blackpool South | £212.2m | £1,885 | £3,011 | |
| 8 | Blackley and Middleton South | £216.2m | £1,874 | £3,007 | |
| 9 | Birmingham Erdington | £233.0m | £1,846 | £2,891 | |
| 10 | Queen's Park and Maida Vale | £258.3m | £2,072 | £2,884 | |
| 11 | Lewisham East | £230.1m | £1,953 | £2,864 | |
| 12 | Liverpool Walton | £185.1m | £1,807 | £2,862 | |
| 13 | Croydon West | £262.5m | £1,989 | £2,860 | |
| 14 | East Thanet | £180.1m | £1,695 | £2,859 | |
| 15 | Barking | £273.0m | £1,916 | £2,857 | |
| 16 | Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough | £208.3m | £1,806 | £2,839 | |
| 17 | Birmingham Northfield | £189.3m | £1,731 | £2,821 | |
| 18 | Birmingham Yardley | £209.4m | £1,777 | £2,807 | |
| 19 | Birmingham Perry Barr | £230.3m | £1,838 | £2,803 | |
| 20 | East Ham | £263.2m | £1,929 | £2,801 | |
| 21 | Bradford East | £220.7m | £1,781 | £2,792 | |
| 22 | Gorton and Denton | £211.7m | £1,777 | £2,777 | |
| 23 | Southgate and Wood Green | £235.9m | £1,848 | £2,748 | |
| 24 | Walsall and Bloxwich | £216.7m | £1,732 | £2,746 | |
| 25 | Ealing North | £244.4m | £1,817 | £2,714 | |
| 26 | Nottingham North and Kimberley | £184.7m | £1,681 | £2,705 | |
| 27 | Middlesbrough and Thornaby East | £210.3m | £1,735 | £2,688 | |
| 28 | Bradford West | £221.7m | £1,744 | £2,685 | |
| 29 | Bootle | £177.0m | £1,697 | £2,684 | |
| 30 | Bradford South | £185.9m | £1,657 | £2,665 | |
| 31 | Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes | £175.7m | £1,623 | £2,665 | |
| 32 | Leeds South | £238.7m | £1,806 | £2,663 | |
| 33 | Hartlepool | £159.0m | £1,620 | £2,651 | |
| 34 | Wolverhampton South East | £212.8m | £1,658 | £2,643 | |
| 35 | Bolton South and Walkden | £215.2m | £1,650 | £2,626 | |
| 36 | Bethnal Green and Stepney | £268.3m | £1,992 | £2,594 | |
| 37 | Birkenhead | £177.5m | £1,616 | £2,579 | |
| 38 | Easington | £151.1m | £1,570 | £2,556 | |
| 39 | Knowsley | £158.8m | £1,603 | £2,551 | |
| 40 | Erith and Thamesmead | £241.3m | £1,728 | £2,541 | |
| 41 | Kingston upon Hull East | £162.4m | £1,557 | £2,532 | |
| 42 | Birmingham Ladywood | £309.9m | £1,857 | £2,531 | |
| 43 | Finchley and Golders Green | £207.7m | £1,598 | £2,513 | |
| 44 | Hendon | £235.7m | £1,692 | £2,508 | |
| 45 | Blackburn | £187.4m | £1,575 | £2,503 | |
| 46 | Derby South | £203.2m | £1,620 | £2,503 | |
| 47 | Coventry East | £199.1m | £1,589 | £2,496 | |
| 48 | Southend East and Rochford | £158.7m | £1,554 | £2,489 | |
| 49 | Clacton | £135.7m | £1,317 | £2,480 | |
| 50 | Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton | £182.7m | £1,554 | £2,479 |
Values are per person aged 16 to 64 unless a column says otherwise. Sources: Department for Work and Pensions, Office for National Statistics, National Records of Scotland.
Every measureThe full list, as plain links
Choose a measure
Search benefit spending, people receiving benefits and income tax