How does my area compare?

Queen's Park and Maida Vale has the highest spending on Housing Benefit per resident in 2024-25.

Help with rent. Most people who get it now are pensioners or live in supported housing. Shown in cash terms, not adjusted for inflation.

Spending on Housing Benefit, per resident, 2024-25, by constituency

Selected Beverley and Holderness: £111 per resident, 2024-25, 583rd of 632 constituencies.

Per resident, low to high

  1. Under £174
  2. £174 to £257
  3. £257 to £340
  4. £340 to £423
  5. £423 to £506
  6. £506 and over
Spending on Housing Benefit, per resident, 2024-25, by constituency. Boundaries are simplified. London is also shown larger, in a separate box. Northern Ireland is not covered. Every value is in the table below.
More ways to look at itHow ranks change, why spending changed, and spending compared with the expected level

Total or per person

Does the order change when you count per person?

Each line is one of the 632 ranked constituencies. It joins the area's rank for each way of counting. The 10 highest per resident are drawn in dark lines, and the selected area in gold.

TotalPer resident1632Queen's Park and Maida Vale 1Birmingham Perry Barr 2Hackney North and Stoke Newington 3Brent East 4Holborn and St Pancras 5Tottenham 6Kensington and Bayswater 7Islington North 8Birmingham Erdington 9Islington South and Finsbury 10Beverley and Holderness 583

What changed

More people, more claims or bigger payments?

Beverley and Holderness, Housing Benefit: yearly spending at the rate in March 2023 and in March 2026. The chart splits the change into three parts: the number of people in the age group, the share of them claiming, and the average payment. Cash terms, not adjusted for inflation.

£10.1mMarch 2023+£0.10mPopulation−£3.8mShare claiming+£1.5mPayment size£7.9mMarch 2026
What changed: Housing Benefit
March 2023£10.1m
Population+£0.10m
Share claiming−£3.8m
Payment size+£1.5m
March 2026£7.9m
The share claiming is the number of people claiming per resident. Yearly spending here is the number claiming, times the average weekly payment, times 52. It is not the amount paid out over the year. Population after mid-2024 stays at the mid-2024 figure, so later growth shows in the share claiming.

Compared with similar areas

Is spending higher or lower than expected?

Benefit spending per resident, 2024-25. We compare it with the level we would expect from each area's share of children and of people aged 66 and over, how deprived it is compared with the rest of its nation, and the typical pay of people who live there. Cash terms, not adjusted for inflation.

Chart step
This chart needs JavaScript. Each area's expected level is on its area page.
Expected level = −£880 + £1,417 × share aged 0 to 15 + £9,950 × share aged 66 and over − £207 × deprivation decile + £391 × ln(median pay) + £506 × Wales + £250 × Scotland. Fitted by ordinary least squares across 625 constituencies. R² = 0.84. Gold dots are above the expected level and grey dots are below it.

Every constituency

Spending on Housing Benefit, 2024-25. Rank is for per resident, and 1 is the highest. Areas with fewer than 1,000 people in the age group have no rank. The first 50 of 632 rows are shown.

Spending on Housing Benefit for every constituency, 2024-25
RankNotes
1Queen's Park and Maida Vale£126.5m£1,015
2Birmingham Perry Barr£101.6m£811
3Hackney North and Stoke Newington£92.8m£790
4Brent East£105.2m£767
5Holborn and St Pancras£78.9m£706
6Tottenham£94.7m£684
7Kensington and Bayswater£89.5m£676
8Islington North£74.3m£669
9Birmingham Erdington£83.9m£665
10Islington South and Finsbury£77.1m£635
11Lewisham East£74.0m£628
12Hackney South and Shoreditch£74.0m£628
13Birmingham Ladywood£103.6m£621
14Edmonton and Winchmore Hill£71.2m£569
15Cities of London and Westminster£74.3m£566
16Croydon West£73.2m£554
17Birmingham Edgbaston£60.8m£552
18Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley£66.4m£552
19Enfield North£69.4m£544
20Glasgow North£61.8m£537
21Bethnal Green and Stepney£70.3m£522
22Vauxhall and Camberwell Green£55.2m£521
23West Ham and Beckton£76.0m£514
24Hampstead and Highgate£59.8m£508
25Peckham£56.5m£505
26Lewisham West and East Dulwich£49.4m£497
27Birmingham Yardley£57.4m£487
28Liverpool Riverside£63.7m£484
29Glasgow North East£55.1m£479
30Dulwich and West Norwood£49.9m£474
31Hammersmith and Chiswick£55.2m£466
32Glasgow East£49.1m£466
33East Ham£63.5m£465
34Streatham and Croydon North£55.9m£463
35Ealing Central and Acton£63.5m£457
36Clapham and Brixton Hill£47.1m£454
37Southgate and Wood Green£57.0m£446
38Chelsea and Fulham£53.4m£437
39Lewisham North£50.8m£433
40Nottingham East£54.4m£433
41Finchley and Golders Green£56.1m£432
42Stratford and Bow£59.2m£429
43Poplar and Limehouse£63.5m£425
44Ealing North£56.7m£422
45Tooting£45.1m£417
46Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven£40.6m£413
47Hornsey and Friern Barnet£41.7m£410
48Erith and Thamesmead£57.1m£409
49Birmingham Selly Oak£44.9m£409
50Edinburgh East and Musselburgh£47.5m£408

League table of every constituency for the latest period

Values are per resident unless a column says otherwise. Sources: Department for Work and Pensions, Office for National Statistics, National Records of Scotland.

Every measureThe full list, as plain links

Choose a measure

Search benefit spending, people receiving benefits and income tax